Category Archives: Uncategorized

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Integer quis sodales lorem, ac dignissim nibh. Cras at accumsan nisi, a rhoncus velit. Aenean non rutrum libero. Curabitur laoreet quam eu sem venenatis, id placerat metus interdum. Quisque vel elit et enim rhoncus ultrices vel non mi. Aliquam quis luctus nibh. Vivamus elementum justo augue. Interdum et malesuada fames ac ante ipsum primis in faucibus. Nunc et mi vel ligula consequat bibendum. Suspendisse potenti. Praesent molestie eros mauris, eget eleifend leo maximus imperdiet.

Mauris aliquet luctus eros id facilisis. Vivamus et sem sed justo mollis facilisis vitae ut nisl. Nulla volutpat mattis nulla, ac interdum mi tempor lacinia. Sed eu odio eget purus sollicitudin dapibus. Vestibulum arcu enim, sagittis eu sagittis sit amet, maximus quis lacus. Fusce eu elit rhoncus, pretium sapien vitae, porta metus. Quisque dui urna, auctor nec iaculis vel, semper ut odio. Donec hendrerit, lacus non tempus varius, nisi augue tempus mauris, quis malesuada augue nibh non erat. Etiam rutrum vulputate sem vitae elementum. Nam elementum consectetur velit.

Sed felis velit, volutpat nec sodales eu, gravida non eros. Sed luctus mollis dui. Donec eu tortor vestibulum est fringilla imperdiet. Ut a neque non odio iaculis porttitor. Quisque laoreet tristique nisi, vitae maximus orci molestie nec. Nulla facilisi. Cras vulputate, tortor nec tristique egestas, turpis arcu tincidunt magna, quis vestibulum urna arcu vel ipsum. Vestibulum imperdiet quam vel elit volutpat, molestie molestie erat fermentum. Praesent accumsan leo lacus, et aliquet ligula tristique ac. Donec tortor sem, rhoncus a tincidunt id, laoreet eu tortor. Vestibulum vitae interdum nisi, ac ornare risus. Morbi maximus mauris nisi, sed iaculis ante elementum quis.

Maecenas sed sapien in mauris fermentum euismod. Ut fringilla risus erat, ac facilisis augue aliquet vulputate. Aliquam nec nulla malesuada, finibus libero sit amet, accumsan velit. Nullam felis mauris, elementum non justo et, iaculis congue tellus. Ut interdum odio non turpis congue lobortis. Morbi venenatis consequat velit ultrices lacinia. Aenean ut nisi convallis, sagittis quam vel, volutpat ante.

Donec tincidunt libero massa, sit amet maximus dui pharetra ac. Donec nec lectus dapibus, accumsan purus sit amet, ullamcorper felis. Maecenas hendrerit felis et magna feugiat, ut ullamcorper lectus vehicula. Suspendisse potenti. Duis suscipit mollis est et luctus. Ut vitae ipsum arcu. Suspendisse lacinia neque ante, vel suscipit risus scelerisque sed. Praesent pellentesque non nunc quis tempor. Ut tincidunt velit sed nisi elementum, ac venenatis orci aliquam.

Advertisements

2/28 Aging in Cassavetes’ Opening Night

In 1977, the same year Star Wars was setting box office records; independent film pioneer John Cassavetes released his film Opening Night. Cassavetes distinctive storytelling style brings the emotional crisis of a middle aged actress coming to terms with her age and past to life. After witnessing the death of a young fan, actress Myrtle Gordon confronts her personal turmoil’s as she deals with conflicts in her career. Characteristic of the director’s work, the film utilizes cinema-verite documentary style cinematography charting her struggle in a realistic way (Cassavetes).
In a pivotal scene the writer of the play in which Myrtle has been starring, confronts her about her inability to successfully play the role. Myrtle reveals the issues she has playing a character experiencing menopause and emotions of a much older woman then the actress is in reality. The 65 year old playwright has difficult understanding Myrtle’s inability to properly feel the role and believes she is trying to deny the fact that she is growing older. Myrtle defends her resistance to playing the role by expressing her fear that if she successfully plays the role the public will see her as an older actress and her acting opportunities will be greatly limited. She desires to bring her emotions more to the surface she believes the young girl that died in the accident encompasses.
As this scene illustrates, Myrtle’s struggle addresses fear that actresses have of aging and the limits it will place on their career. Furthermore, it conveys a universal nostalgia for one’s youth which is viewed by Myrtle as a time when she could access her emotional artistic energy easily, as age has buried her feelings deeper within. In another clip in which Cassavetes talks about the film, he rants about why people should go to see an unconventional film like Opening Night. He contends that the film is about everyone’s desire to express their emotions theatrically.

Avengers and Point Break

Hey everyone. So today I was sitting in a theater watching the tent-pole superhero film of the summer (gasp! what ever could it be?), when our dear hero Tony Stark referred to  Thor as “Point Break.” I nearly choked on my popcorn and was the only person in the whole theater who laughed.

The legend of Bodhi and Johnny Utah lives on. And thanks to this class, I can be in on the joke.

Have a great summer everybody.

4/24 Cinema’s Ever-Present Past

Today’s class we started off watching the opening to the Todd Haynes film “I’m Not There” raising issues of identity.  In the film multiple actors portray the legendary rock icon Bob Dylan each depicting a different aspect of his life and personality.  Depicting many facets that make up Dylan’s persona with, Cate Blanchett’s personification perhaps the most interesting of all, challenges the nature of having fixed identity. 

       Next we discussed the Jenkin’s reading discussing modern uses of technology in educational contexts.  The presentation’s overarching questions dealt with the ways technology can be used for student’s to participate in an educational environment by creating an interactive atmosphere. 

   The next presentation covered the McGowen’s analysis of David Lynch’s “Mulholland Drive” through Lacanian psychoanalysis.  McGowen emphasizes the distinction between the levels of fantasy and desire that film exists on.  The first part of the film exists mainly in the fantasy world of the character Betty and is characterized by positivity.  The second half is the harsh reality of the world of her desires.  Throughout the essay McGowen discusses how the film fits into the classic Hollywood cinema emphasizing the distinctions Lynch makes between elements of storytelling filmmakers have historically blended together.   

4/3 Bruno’s Recitation: Indie’s Heyday

   Our discussion of the growth of independent cinema in the early 1990s began by talking about two documentaries about the life of serial killer Aileen Wuornos.  The conversation focused on the way that America’s first “female serial killer” was discussed in the media especially in terms of gender.  Her story fascinated the media going on to inspire many different book and movie topics just as Wuornos herself prophesized in her last interview before her execution.  Her legacy raises a number of questions about the effects of her being a woman–furthermore a lesbian woman–has on the way her story is portrayed in popular culture. 

      We went on to analyze the ways in which independent films reach an audience. What does it mean to fill a niche audience opposed mainstream appeal?  What subjects can indie films explore the studio system believes would alienate a wide audience?  To illustrate this point we watched a clip from the Todd Haynes film “Happiness” in which a father character talks to his son about “cumming.”  The context of the scene that makes it even more disturbing is that the father is a pedophile unbeknownst to his family. 

  Next we talked about issues of masculinity in “Boys Don’t Cry” related to the way Brandon’s “performance” as a man effects those around him.  Brandon’s murder can largely be seen as a result of him conning those around him and insulting the masculinity of the men that commit kill him. 

Jaap’s Recitation 5/2

Apologies for the tardiness! Finals week and all.

Jaap started off the recitation by showing us a clip from the original movie Tron. Although a couple of us in class were scoffing at how ridiculous it looked, Jaap was quick to remind us that it was the very first film that used actual CGI, which in retrospect was pretty great, particularly the sound design that went with it that really made the crappy models come to life.

We discussed the ethics surrounding the advent of CGI, and how the previous stigma of everything in front of the camera being real and true had been shattered with its invention.

Jaap then compared the clip to another clip from Speed Racer, a present day film that used a lot of CGI. The topic of 3D was brought up. A majority of the class really disliked 3D and felt like it was cheap and that it added nothing to the value of any films. One person said that good cinematography can do anything that 3D can without having 3D involved. Some speculated that 3D was just a passing phase and that its novelty would wear off fairly quickly.

After the Stephen Prince presentation, we talked about Zodiac and how even it(being a film rooted in realism and involving basically no elements of fantasy or sci-fi) employed the use of CGI to replicated buildings and such. We then went around the room and talked about our favorite and least favorite films that we’ve seen in class and wrapped a wonderful semeseter.

Bruno’s 4:55 Recitation, 4/18

My apologies. This is inexcusably late.

Bruno began recitation that day with a clip from Bowling for Columbine. It dealt greatly with the notion that the media is responsible for the incredible amount of fear in America. After the clip we had a discussion about whether Moore developed a sound argument/what problems the film and clip might have had. Some believed that Moore manipulates facts in order to create leftist propaganda. Others agreed but thought that at the same time he does create an interesting dialog between what the media does and what he does. Others argued that it is not Michael Moore’s responsibility to create a fair and balanced film, that task is more left for journalists. Moore is creating a point of view, and a persuasive one at that.

People argued that the issue here is not that Moore should make his films differently, it is the perception his films garner. People believe them as fact. His films are widely accepted and embraced by leftists. Once again, is this the artist’s responsibility? Is Moore being hypocritical? Or does he know exactly what he is doing? One thing is for certain: Moore’s films are widely accepted because they are simply so accessible. He is essentially a Hollywood filmmaker.

Next was the Waxman reading presentation. The piece dealt mostly with the rise of powerful films being made through the hollywood system between the years 1998 and 2001.

A major moment in the events leading up to this was Polygraph folding after being sold to Universal. This was important because Polygraph produced many independent films. Being John Malkovich, a script by a then unknown Charlie Kaufman, gets sent over to Universal, and ends up under the radar for some time.

Shortly after this, what ensues is an interesting balance between independent and  old hollywood style films forming a delicate balance with one another in the film industry. Subversive films are greenlit, and then studios try to extract any subversive qualities from them. We also see a good deal of new unique directors rise to the forefront and get away with a lot with their films. Spike Jonze had a growing reputation as a livewire on set, with an unusual directing style. David O. Russel makes Three Kings and begins to have a reputation of being brilliant but often abrasive. With the film Traffic, director Steven Soderbergh is shockingly allowed to photograph his own film. Also, David Fincher’s Fight Club gets made and is filled with an incredible amount of violence for a mainstream film.

After this clip, Bruno then screened a clip from Fight Club, and we discussed its themes of how consumer culture lessens individuality.

As time was running out in class, we had another quick reading presentation for the Brutalized Bodies article. The article primarily discussed how films Like Fight Club and American Psycho are problematic with the subjects they attempt to address. Ultimately, they take advantage of anxiety and are gimmicky because they are really tackling much simpler issues like masculinity.

Then we ran out of time and didn’t really get to discuss American Psycho. Sorry this is so late!